Popular YouTuber Sneako has ignited a fierce online debate with a provocative statement criticising United States foreign policy, specifically its recent military intervention in Venezuela. He argued that actions labelled as terrorism if undertaken by other nations are often rebranded as colonialism when executed by America.
The Provocative Statement That Lit the Fuse
In a social media post that quickly went viral, Sneako drew a sharp comparison. "If a brown country invaded America to bomb DC and kidnap the president for the sole purpose of stealing our oil, we would rightfully call them terrorists. When Americans do it it’s called colonialism," he stated. The commentator was directly referring to last week's large-scale US military strike in Venezuela, which led to the capture of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores.
The operation, announced by former President Donald Trump on social media, was dubbed Operation Absolute Resolve. It involved airstrikes in and around the capital, Caracas. Following the operation, Maduro and his wife were flown to the United States, where the Venezuelan leader is scheduled to appear in a Manhattan federal court. He faces serious federal charges, including narco-terrorism and drug trafficking.
Divided Reactions and the Defence of American Power
The dramatic move by the US has received mixed reactions domestically. While supporters of the Trump administration, particularly in MAGA circles, have appreciated the decisive action, Democratic lawmakers have strongly criticised it. They have pointed out that the Republican government proceeded without seeking congressional approval, labelling the military strikes as unconstitutional.
Sneako's remarks, however, were swiftly dismissed by right-wing influencer Matt Welsh. Welsh countered the YouTuber's premise by stating that "No Brown country" is capable of attacking Washington. He aligned himself with the views of Vice President JD Vance and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, agreeing that America has the right to use brute force to deliver justice anywhere in the world. "We're Americans and we actually love our country and want it to succeed," Welsh asserted.
The Broader Debate on Double Standards
The controversy has spilled over into a wider discussion on perceived double standards in international relations and the rhetoric surrounding military interventions. One social media user responded to Sneako's post by claiming that "Brown countries have already invaded America and are looting our treasury," adding another layer to the heated exchange.
The incident highlights the deep political and ideological divides in how America's global role is perceived. On one side, critics like Sneako frame powerful military actions against sovereign nations as a form of modern-day colonialism. On the other, figures like Welsh defend them as necessary assertions of American strength and a means to uphold justice, showcasing a fundamental clash in perspectives on foreign policy and national identity.
