Uttarakhand CM Dhami Rejects US Think-Tank Report Ranking Him Top for Alleged Hate Speeches
Uttarakhand CM Dismisses US Report on Hate Speeches

Uttarakhand Chief Minister Dismisses US Think-Tank Report on Hate Speeches

Uttarakhand Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami has firmly rejected a recent report by a US-based think-tank that ranked him at the top among political leaders in India for alleged hate speeches. In a sharp response, Dhami asserted his commitment to protecting the culture, traditions, and religious values of Devbhoomi, while ensuring a safe environment for future generations.

Report Details and Rankings

The report was released by India Hate Lab, a research project under the Center for the Study of Organized Hate (CSOH), a Washington-based think-tank. According to the findings, Dhami was attributed with 71 alleged hate speeches, placing him first in a list of politicians across the country. The report highlighted that Uttar Pradesh recorded the highest number of such speeches in 2025 at 266, while Uttarakhand reported 155 incidents.

Dhami's Defiant Response

Responding to the report, Dhami told TOI on Wednesday, "If someone wants to rank me number one, I welcome the decision. But I am very clear that we will not compromise on the issue of Devbhoomi." He emphasized his focus on providing a safe Uttarakhand for children and future generations, stating his willingness to take necessary steps in the interest of the Himalayan state's people.

Dhami further elaborated, "They should not live under any kind of doubt or fear. This is not just my pledge but the commitment of the people of Devbhoomi. I have never hated anyone; therefore, the question of hate speech does not arise. Should I not talk about jihad, demographic change and encroachment? I am surprised at how I have been ranked number one."

Stand on Culture and Demography

In the past, the chief minister has been vocal on contentious issues such as land jihad, love jihad, and demographic changes. Addressing these topics, Dhami added, "If protecting culture, tradition and demography, and speaking about them, is considered hate speech, then I welcome this decision. Please go ahead and give me a higher rank. We will maintain, protect and preserve the original character of Uttarakhand, and if someone considers that hate speech, I cannot help it."

Clarification on Intent and Public Statements

On the issue of intent behind his speeches, Dhami clarified, "Do you think I have ever spoken to anyone in anger? When alone, I might have felt annoyed about something, but I have never said anything in public in a fit of rage." This statement underscores his defense against allegations of promoting hate through his public addresses.

The controversy highlights ongoing debates around free speech, cultural preservation, and political rhetoric in India, with Dhami positioning himself as a steadfast protector of Uttarakhand's heritage amidst external criticisms.