Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) national secretary P K Kunhalikutty has drawn a clear distinction between the recent demolition drive in Bengaluru and similar actions reported in Uttar Pradesh. Speaking to reporters, the senior leader provided crucial context to the ongoing situation in Karnataka's capital.
Kunhalikutty's Key Clarification
Addressing the media, Kunhalikutty firmly stated that the nature of the Bengaluru demolition drive should not be equated with incidents that have occurred in Uttar Pradesh. His comments come amid nationwide discussions on urban development drives and their execution. The leader emphasized the need to understand the specific context and legal framework governing actions in each state.
Engagement with Karnataka Leadership
In a significant revelation, Kunhalikutty confirmed that he has been in direct communication with key figures in the Karnataka government. He disclosed having spoken to state ministers as well as the Chief Minister regarding the matter. This high-level engagement suggests the issue is being discussed at the top echelons of the state's administration.
The discussions, which took place recently, focused on the circumstances surrounding the drive. Kunhalikutty's outreach indicates an effort to bridge communication and ensure community concerns are heard by the state's decision-makers.
Context and Implications
The leader's statement, made on 28 December 2025, serves to contextualize the events in Bengaluru separately from politically charged comparisons. By highlighting his direct talks with the Karnataka leadership, Kunhalikutty points to a channel of dialogue that may not be present or similarly utilized in other regions.
This distinction is crucial for public perception and political narrative. It implies that the situation in Bengaluru is being handled through established governmental protocols and communication lines, potentially differentiating it from other states where such drives have sparked major controversies.
The development underscores the importance of state-specific approaches to law and order and urban policy. Kunhalikutty's role as a national secretary of the IUML lending his voice to this issue also highlights the political and community dimensions intertwined with urban administrative actions.
