Speaker Ganesh Gaonkar of the Goa Legislative Assembly made a firm statement on Tuesday. He declared that matters currently under judicial consideration cannot be discussed within the House. This ruling applies to all cases pending before courts of law.
Protecting Victim Privacy Under Law
Gaonkar emphasized specific legal protections. He stated that details about victims under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and the Goa Children's Act are strictly confidential. These laws explicitly safeguard the identity and privacy of victims. The Assembly has a duty to uphold these protections, according to the Speaker.
He further clarified the scope of privacy rights. Personal finances, relationships, and private life of any individual fall under legal privacy guarantees. No person or authority can infringe upon this right except as permitted by law.
Restraint and Procedure for Members
The Speaker outlined expectations for Assembly members. He urged them to exercise restraint in their remarks. Members should avoid making defamatory statements or comments that undermine anyone's dignity and reputation.
Gaonkar also highlighted procedural requirements. When seeking information, members must clearly cite the specific provision of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business. This ensures proper parliamentary conduct during discussions.
Opposition Challenges the Speaker's Ruling
In response, St Andre MLA Viresh Borkar voiced strong opposition. He argued that many matters reach courts precisely because the government fails to address public concerns. Borkar expressed frustration that the government often avoids answering questions by citing sub judice status.
The opposition MLA directly addressed the Speaker. He requested a formal ruling on his point of order. Borkar insisted that the opposition must have an opportunity to raise critical issues, regardless of court proceedings.
This exchange highlights ongoing tensions in the Goa Assembly. The Speaker's emphasis on legal boundaries clashes with the opposition's demand for governmental accountability. The debate continues over balancing judicial process with legislative discussion.
