AAP Leader Sanjay Singh Condemns UP Government Over Prayagraj Incident
Aam Admi Party (AAP) leader and Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh met with Swami Avimukteshwaranand on Friday, strongly criticizing the Mauni Amavasya incident in Prayagraj. Singh described the event as an unpardonable crime committed by the state government and the mela administration, emphasizing its severe implications for religious freedom and Hindu traditions.
Attack on Religion and Hindu Faith
Sanjay Singh asserted that the incident was not merely an attack on religion but also an open insult to Hindu traditions and faith. He expressed deep concern over the treatment of Swami Avimukteshwaranand and his disciples during the holy occasion.
Singh stated, "What kind of religion and system is being run in Uttar Pradesh? Who is a Shankaracharya and who is not is not decided by the PM, the chief minister, any police commissioner, or a revenue officer. Shankaracharyas are determined by the traditions and scriptural customs of Hinduism, and no one has the right to question this."
Details of the Incident and Allegations
According to Singh, the incident involved several distressing actions against Swami Avimukteshwaranand and his followers:
- Disciples were pushed and subjected to physical assault.
- Their hair was pulled, leading to humiliation and beatings.
- Swamiji was prevented from taking a holy dip in the Sangam, a sacred ritual.
Singh labeled these actions as a grave crime and sin, holding the Yogi Adityanath-led state government and its administration directly responsible. He highlighted the additional humiliation faced by Swami Avimukteshwaranand, who was asked to provide proof of his Shankaracharya status, a demand Singh deemed inappropriate and disrespectful.
Broader Implications and Political Context
This incident has sparked significant debate about the intersection of politics and religion in Uttar Pradesh. Singh's remarks underscore a growing tension between governmental authorities and religious figures, particularly in matters of tradition and faith.
The AAP leader's criticism extends beyond the immediate event, questioning the overall governance and religious tolerance in the state. His comments reflect a broader political narrative where opposition parties are challenging the ruling government's handling of sensitive religious issues.
As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how the state government will respond to these allegations and what measures will be taken to address the concerns raised by Sanjay Singh and others involved.
