16th Finance Commission Report: Kerala, Assam, Tamil Nadu Gain Tax Share; Bengal Sees Dip
16th Finance Commission: Kerala Tax Share Up, Bengal Down

16th Finance Commission Report Unveiled: Key Changes in State Tax Allocations

Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman presented the 16th Finance Commission's report in the Lok Sabha on February 1, 2026, outlining significant adjustments in the distribution of Union taxes and duties among states. The recommendations, which have been accepted by the Centre, will take effect in the financial year 2026-27, impacting several poll-bound states with elections scheduled in the coming months.

Tax Share Revisions for Poll-Bound States

Among the four states heading to elections—Assam, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and West Bengal—three are set to benefit from increased shares in the divisible pool of Union taxes. Collectively, these states will receive an additional Rs 9,234 crore in 2026-27 compared to allocations under the previous 15th Finance Commission.

Kerala, under Left rule, emerges as the biggest gainer, with its share rising from 1.925% to 2.382%. This translates to an extra Rs 6,975 crore from a total divisible pool of Rs 15.26 lakh crore for the fiscal year.

Assam, governed by the BJP, sees a marginal increase from 3.128% to 3.258%, resulting in an additional Rs 1,994 crore.

Tamil Nadu, ruled by the DMK, experiences a slight uptick from 4.079% to 4.097%, granting it an extra Rs 275 crore.

In contrast, West Bengal, led by the Trinamool Congress, faces a reduction in its share from 7.523% to 7.215%, leading to a decrease of Rs 4,700 crore for the state in 2026-27.

Grants for Local Bodies and Disaster Management

The Commission has also recommended substantial grants for local bodies over the next five years (2026-27 to 2030-31), totaling Rs 7.91 lakh crore. This includes:

  • Rs 4.35 lakh crore for rural local bodies (gram panchayat, block panchayat, district panchayat).
  • Rs 3.56 lakh crore for urban local bodies.

Specific allocations for the poll-bound states are as follows:

  1. Rural grants: Assam (Rs 14,580 crore), Kerala (Rs 3,308 crore), Tamil Nadu (Rs 16,930 crore), West Bengal (Rs 28,203 crore).
  2. Urban grants: Assam (Rs 3,249 crore), Kerala (Rs 16,683 crore), Tamil Nadu (Rs 25,069 crore), West Bengal (Rs 22,023 crore).

Additionally, Howrah in West Bengal and Coimbatore in Tamil Nadu have been selected among 22 cities to receive Special Infrastructure component grants, though exact amounts remain unspecified.

For disaster management, a corpus of Rs 2,04,401 crore is recommended for the State Disaster Response Fund and State Disaster Mitigation Fund from 2026-27 to 2030-31. Allocations include Assam (Rs 5,825 crore), Kerala (Rs 2,580 crore), Tamil Nadu (Rs 11,314 crore), and West Bengal (Rs 9,158 crore).

Commission's Warning on Subsidy Burdens

Beyond financial allocations, the 16th Finance Commission issued a cautionary note to states regarding rising subsidy expenditures. It specifically highlighted West Bengal's Lakshmir Bhandar scheme, a cash transfer program for women, as an example of the growing strain on state exchequers.

The report emphasized, "There is a need to introduce sunset clauses, especially in schemes that provide subsidies on non-merit private goods and general unconditional transfers. We recommend that governments establish mechanisms to review subsidies and transfers and include a sunset or exit clause in their implementation mechanisms."

Political Implications of Upcoming Elections

The four states and Union Territory of Puducherry, which is also due for polls, hold significant political weight, accounting for 116 Lok Sabha seats, 51 Rajya Sabha seats, and 840 Legislative Assembly seats. With 13 Rajya Sabha seats becoming vacant later this year, these elections are crucial for the BJP's expansion efforts in southern states and Bengal, while opposition parties aim to defend their regional strongholds. The outcomes may also influence next year's Presidential elections.

The 16th Finance Commission's recommendations mark a pivotal shift in fiscal federalism, balancing economic support with calls for fiscal prudence as states navigate electoral and financial challenges.