YouTuber Faces Legal Action in Sabarimala Gold Controversy
Kerala police have registered a case against a YouTuber for making allegations about missing gold from the famous Sabarimala temple. The case was filed on November 26, 2025, marking a significant development in the ongoing controversy surrounding the holy shrine.
Legal Charges Against the YouTuber
The police have invoked multiple sections against the content creator. The primary charges include BNS 192, which deals with wantonly giving provocation with intent to cause riot. Additionally, the YouTuber faces charges under BNS 196(1)(a) for promoting enmity between different groups.
Authorities have also applied Section 120(o) of the Kerala Police Act against the accused. This comprehensive legal action demonstrates the seriousness with which law enforcement is treating the matter, particularly given Sabarimala's status as one of Kerala's most prominent pilgrimage destinations.
Context and Implications
The case emerges amid heightened sensitivity around temple security and management. Sabarimala, which attracts millions of devotees annually, has been at the center of various controversies in recent years. The gold missing allegations had sparked concerns among devotees and the general public alike.
Legal experts suggest that the charges indicate the police's concern about potential social unrest that could arise from such allegations. The invocation of sections related to provoking riots and promoting enmity suggests authorities believe the YouTuber's content could have led to communal tension or public disorder.
The case represents an important test of how Indian authorities are handling social media content that potentially affects religious sentiments and public order. It also highlights the growing influence of digital creators and the legal responsibilities that come with that influence.
Police officials have confirmed that investigations are ongoing and that appropriate legal procedures are being followed. The development has sparked discussions about freedom of expression, responsible content creation, and the protection of religious institutions from unfounded allegations.
