The Supreme Court of India has taken a significant step in a high-profile criminal case, ordering its transfer from a sessions court to the Calcutta High Court. This decision pertains to the alleged rape and murder of a female trainee doctor, which occurred on the premises of the R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital in Kolkata.
Supreme Court's Directive for Expedited Justice
A bench comprising Justices Hrishikesh Roy and Prashant Kumar Mishra issued the transfer order on Tuesday, May 27, 2025. The apex court acted on a petition filed by the victim's father, who sought a swift and fair trial. The bench emphasized the need for an expeditious proceeding and directed the Calcutta High Court to conclude the trial as speedily as possible, ideally within six months.
The court specifically instructed the High Court to take over the case from the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court at Barasat in North 24 Parganas district. The case will now be tried by the High Court itself, exercising its original criminal jurisdiction. This move is seen as a measure to ensure a thorough and unimpeded judicial process.
Background and Allegations in the Case
The tragic incident that led to this legal battle dates back to June 2022. The victim, a second-year postgraduate medical trainee, was found dead within the college campus. The initial investigation led to the arrest of another trainee doctor from the same institution. He was charged under serious sections of the Indian Penal Code, including those related to rape and murder.
The victim's family, seeking justice, approached the Supreme Court after expressing concerns over the pace and handling of the case in the lower court. Their petition highlighted the gravity of the crime and the urgent need for a trial free from any potential local complexities or delays.
Legal Implications and Next Steps
The Supreme Court's order to transfer the case to a constitutional court like the High Court is a notable intervention. It underscores the judiciary's proactive role in ensuring that sensitive cases, especially those involving heinous crimes and institutional settings, are adjudicated efficiently and with the utmost seriousness.
By setting a six-month timeline for the completion of the trial, the Supreme Court has sent a strong message about the priority of this case. The Calcutta High Court will now assume direct responsibility for examining evidence, hearing witnesses, and delivering a verdict. This process is expected to be closely monitored given the public interest and the tragic loss of a young medical professional.
The legal community views this transfer as a step that could potentially streamline the judicial process. The High Court, with its authority and resources, is now tasked with delivering justice in a case that has drawn widespread attention and raised questions about safety within educational institutions.
