Crime Branch Investigation Ordered into PSC Irregularities
Kerala Chief Minister V D Satheesan announced on Wednesday that the state Crime Branch will investigate alleged irregularities in the conduct of Public Service Commission (PSC) examinations and appointments. The decision comes in response to multiple complaints regarding the Kerala Administrative Service (KAS) exams and other recruitment processes handled by the PSC.
Scope of the Probe
The investigation will cover complaints of malpractices, including question paper leaks, manipulation of answer sheets, and irregularities in the appointment process. The CM stated that the government is committed to ensuring transparency and fairness in all recruitment procedures. The Crime Branch has been directed to submit a detailed report within three months.
Background and Complaints
Allegations of irregularities in PSC exams have been surfacing for months, with candidates and opposition parties demanding a probe. The KAS examination, a key recruitment test for state administrative services, has been at the center of the controversy. According to sources, several candidates alleged that the exam was marred by procedural violations and favoritism.
Government's Stance
Speaking to reporters in Thiruvananthapuram, Satheesan said, "We have received credible complaints about irregularities in the PSC examinations. To uphold the integrity of the recruitment process, we have decided to hand over the matter to the Crime Branch." He added that strict action would be taken against anyone found guilty.
Impact on Recruitment
The probe is expected to delay some ongoing recruitment processes. However, the CM assured that the government would expedite the investigation to minimize disruption. The PSC has also been asked to cooperate fully with the investigating team.
Political Reactions
Opposition parties have welcomed the decision but criticized the delay in ordering the probe. The Congress-led UDF alleged that the government was trying to cover up the issue earlier. The ruling LDF defended the move, stating that the investigation would be conducted impartially.
