Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Punjab Kesari to NGT in Hotel Pollution Case, Extends Status Quo
HC Directs Punjab Kesari to NGT in Hotel Pollution Case

High Court Directs Punjab Kesari to Approach NGT in Hotel Pollution Case

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued a significant directive in an environmental compliance case involving a prominent media group's luxury hotel. In a ruling that underscores the importance of statutory environmental remedies, the court has directed The Hind Samachar Limited, owners of the Punjab Kesari newspaper, to approach the National Green Tribunal (NGT) regarding pollution control actions taken against their Park Plaza hotel in Jalandhar.

Court Extends Status Quo for Legal Recourse

While directing the petitioners to seek remedy before the NGT, the Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sanjiv Berry extended the status quo concerning the hotel's operations for one week. This extension, valid until January 30, 2026, provides the petitioners with additional time to pursue appropriate legal avenues while maintaining current operational conditions.

The court disposed of a writ petition filed by The Hind Samachar Limited and associated petitioners challenging emergency closure and electricity disconnection orders issued by the Punjab Pollution Control Board (PPCB). The Bench accepted preliminary objections raised by the Punjab government and PPCB, holding that the petition was not maintainable since the petitioners had an effective statutory remedy available under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.

Substantial Environmental Violations Documented

According to detailed inspection reports presented before the court, the 72-room Park Plaza hotel in Jalandhar's Civil Lines area was found to have multiple environmental compliance failures during a January 13, 2026 inspection. The PPCB documented several serious violations that formed the basis for their enforcement action.

The inspection revealed that the hotel's sewage treatment plant was not operational during the visit, with untreated wastewater being bypassed into municipal corporation sewers through what appeared to be a permanent bypass provision. Additionally, the effluent treatment plant designated for laundry waste was found to be non-functional, resulting in untreated effluent being discharged directly into municipal sewer systems.

Comprehensive Compliance Failures Identified

The environmental inspection documented a comprehensive pattern of non-compliance at the luxury hotel establishment. Beyond the operational failures of treatment plants, inspectors noted several additional violations that raised serious environmental concerns.

  • The hotel lacked proper authorization under the Hazardous Waste Management Rules
  • Diesel generator sets had inadequate stack heights for proper emissions dispersion
  • Proper hazardous waste storage facilities were not maintained
  • The mechanical composter for wet waste was non-operational
  • Essential records relating to water usage, treatment plant operations, and municipal approvals for wastewater discharge were not maintained

Effluent samples collected during the inspection were sent for laboratory testing to further assess the environmental impact of the violations.

Court Upholds PPCB's Emergency Powers

In its ruling, the High Court Bench firmly upheld the pollution control board's authority to exercise emergency powers in situations involving potential environmental harm. The court observed that where the board forms an opinion that grave environmental injury is likely, it may issue directions without providing prior opportunity for objections, provided reasons are recorded in writing.

The Bench specifically addressed arguments regarding natural justice, stating that providing opportunity in emergent situations would defeat the very purpose of vesting emergency powers with regulatory bodies. The court noted that sufficient reasons had been documented in the board's internal communication dated January 13, 2026, and that the law does not require prior communication of these reasons to affected parties.

Legal Distinctions and Precedents Considered

The court carefully distinguished earlier judgments cited by the petitioners, including a significant 2019 Supreme Court ruling in the Sterlite Industries case. The Bench noted that the present matter exclusively falls within the four corners of the Water Act, establishing clear jurisdictional boundaries for the case.

Before concluding proceedings, the Bench took judicial notice of an interim order passed by the Supreme Court on January 20, 2026, in a connected matter. That order allowed uninterrupted functioning of the Punjab Kesari printing press while directing status quo for other commercial establishments, including the hotel in question.

Limited Scope of Judicial Examination

It is important to note that the High Court confined its examination specifically to pollution-related actions taken by the PPCB. The petitioners had originally sought broader relief, including quashing of power disconnection orders and restoration of government advertisements to Hind Samachar Limited as they stood prior to November 2, 2025.

The court disposed of the petition without expressing any view on the merits of the case, leaving it open for the petitioners to approach the NGT for appropriate relief. This procedural direction emphasizes the specialized jurisdiction of environmental tribunals in matters concerning pollution control and environmental compliance.

The ruling reinforces the statutory framework governing environmental protection while balancing the need for regulatory enforcement with opportunities for legal recourse through designated specialized tribunals.