Ex-SEBI Official Convicted in Rs 25 Lakh Rose Valley Bribery Case
Ex-SEBI official guilty in Rs 25 lakh Rose Valley bribe case

A special Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) court in Kolkata delivered a significant verdict on Monday, finding a former Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) official guilty in a high-profile bribery case dating back to 2010. The court convicted RP Singh, who was then an assistant general manager at the market regulator, for demanding a bribe of Rs 25 lakh from Rose Valley Group chairman Gautam Kundu.

The Trap That Led to Conviction

The case stemmed from a formal complaint lodged by Gautam Kundu with the CBI's anti-corruption branch. Kundu alleged that the SEBI official, RP Singh, had demanded the substantial bribe in exchange for accepting certain documents related to his company. Acting swiftly on this complaint, the CBI orchestrated a meticulous trap to catch the accused red-handed.

As part of the operation, Kundu withdrew the Rs 25 lakh amount. The cash was treated with a special chemical coating for forensic evidence. He then offered the money to Singh as demanded. The moment Singh accepted the bribe, a waiting CBI team moved in and arrested him on the spot. This operation provided the central evidence for the prosecution's case.

Legal Proceedings and Immediate Fallout

Following his dramatic arrest, RP Singh was remanded to judicial custody. The market regulator, SEBI, took swift disciplinary action and suspended him from his position. The legal process unfolded over the subsequent years, culminating in Monday's guilty verdict. The special CBI court has reserved its sentence, which is scheduled to be pronounced on Tuesday.

Broader Implications and Awaiting Sentence

This conviction underscores the ongoing efforts by Indian investigative agencies to tackle corruption within regulatory bodies. The case highlights the vulnerabilities that can exist even in institutions tasked with maintaining market integrity. The sentencing on Tuesday will be closely watched, as it will signal the judicial system's stance on such acts of graft involving public officials. The verdict serves as a stern reminder of the legal consequences facing those who attempt to misuse their official authority for personal gain.