A sessions court in Mumbai has delivered a significant ruling, rejecting the temporary bail application of Purushottam Chavan. Chavan, who is the husband of a serving Indian Police Service (IPS) officer, faces serious allegations of defrauding multiple citizens of sums exceeding Rs 24 crore.
The Bail Plea and Grounds for Rejection
The accused had sought release from custody for a period of three months on medical grounds. However, the court was not convinced by the arguments presented for this interim relief. The plea was met with strong opposition from the complainant's side, adding to the court's decision to deny the request.
Strong Opposition from the Complainant
The case's complainant, Kedar Degwekar, actively challenged the bail plea through his legal representative, advocate Mohan Tekavde. Tekavde argued in court that the temporary bail request was a strategic move. He contended it was an attempt to gain freedom through piecemeal relief, especially after Chavan's earlier application for regular bail had already been dismissed by the court. This opposition played a crucial role in the proceedings.
Details of the Alleged Scam
The core of the case revolves around accusations that Purushottam Chavan cheated numerous individuals by making false promises. He allegedly lured victims by offering them apartments under the government quota, a scheme that often attracts citizens seeking affordable housing. The total estimated amount involved in this alleged cheating scandal is a staggering Rs 24 crore, highlighting the scale of the purported fraud.
The court's decision to keep the accused in custody underscores the seriousness with which the judiciary is treating the case. It also reflects the legal system's reluctance to grant relief when there are concerns about the intent behind the application and the gravity of the financial charges involved. The matter continues to be under judicial scrutiny as the legal process moves forward.
