Delhi Court Refuses Cognisance in National Herald Case Against Gandhis
Court Refuses Cognisance in National Herald Case

A court in Delhi has delivered a significant ruling in the high-profile National Herald money laundering case involving top Congress leaders. On 16 December, the Rouse Avenue court refused to take cognisance of the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) case against Rahul Gandhi, Sonia Gandhi, and others, as reported by PTI.

Court's Rationale for the Decision

The court clarified its stance, stating that cognisance cannot be taken at this particular stage. The primary reason cited was the legal foundation of the ED's case. The probe agency's action is based on a private complaint filed by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy and the subsequent summoning orders issued by a magistrate. Crucially, the case is not predicated on any First Information Report (FIR) filed by the ED itself, which formed the core of the court's reasoning for the current refusal.

Investigation to Continue

In a parallel development reported by ANI, the court made it clear that its decision does not halt the investigative process. The court explicitly stated that the Enforcement Directorate may continue with its further investigation into the allegations. This indicates that while the case does not proceed to the next judicial stage immediately, the investigative agency retains the authority to gather more evidence and build its case.

Implications and Next Steps

This ruling represents a procedural moment in the long-running legal and political saga surrounding the National Herald newspaper's assets. The refusal to take cognisance at this juncture is a setback for the ED's immediate plans to advance the case judicially based on the current paperwork. However, the permission for continued investigation leaves the door open for the agency to potentially file a fresh or amended complaint in the future, possibly based on new findings. Legal experts suggest the prosecution may need to strengthen its foundational evidence before the court can formally acknowledge the case. The development is being closely watched for its substantial political ramifications, given the stature of the individuals involved.

This is a breaking story, and further updates are expected as the legal proceedings evolve.