Sambhal Court Orders FIR Against Police Officers in Biscuit Seller Shooting Case
A Chandausi court has taken decisive action in a controversial case from Sambhal, Uttar Pradesh. The court has ordered the registration of a First Information Report against several police officers. This order comes in connection with the gunshot injuries sustained by a young biscuit seller during violent protests in November 2024.
Inconsistencies Between Police Report and Medical Evidence
The court observed significant discrepancies in the official police account. Medical documents presented in the case clearly show that Mohammad Alam suffered multiple gunshot wounds. These records specifically mention "police firing in a riot" as the cause of his injuries.
However, the police report submitted to the court presented a different version. Authorities claimed the bullet removed from Alam's body did not match police-issued ammunition. They stated the recovered bullet was of 7.65 mm caliber, which they said is not used by police forces.
The court found these claims unconvincing. Medical evidence shows Alam sustained two bullet injuries to his back and one to his hand. The injuries were severe enough to cause a bone fracture in his hand. These facts directly contradict the police narrative.
The Violent Incident and Its Aftermath
The shooting occurred on November 24, 2024, during protests against a court-ordered survey of the historic Jama Masjid in Sambhal. Violence erupted near the mosque, resulting in four deaths and multiple injuries among both protesters and police personnel.
Mohammad Alam, a 23-year-old street vendor, was selling biscuits from his handcart that morning. According to his father's plea to the court, Alam noticed a large crowd gathering near the mosque around 8:45 AM. As he approached the area, police officers allegedly opened fire on the crowd.
Alam attempted to flee but was struck by three bullets. Two bullets hit him in the back while one struck his hand. Bystanders rescued him from the scene and he eventually received medical treatment after being turned away from multiple hospitals.
Police Response and Court's Observations
The Sambhal police have maintained their innocence in this matter. They have argued that Alam was wanted in connection with other violence-related cases. Police officials also pointed to the forensic report suggesting the bullet did not match their weapons.
Despite these claims, the court found the police version suspicious. The order specifically noted that medical records and witness statements did not align with the police account. This inconsistency raised serious questions about what actually occurred during the violent protest.
The court emphasized the need for a proper investigation to establish the true facts of the case. It determined that sufficient evidence existed to indicate a cognizable offense had been committed. This finding necessitated the registration of an FIR for proper legal proceedings.
Legal Proceedings and Future Actions
The court has directed the Station House Officer of Sambhal to register the case immediately. Authorities must provide details of the registration within seven days of the order. This legal directive represents a significant development in the case.
However, Sambhal police have indicated they will challenge the court's decision. Superintendent of Police Krishan Kumar stated that authorities plan to file an appeal in the Allahabad High Court. This suggests the legal battle over this incident is far from over.
The case highlights ongoing tensions between law enforcement accountability and public trust in the justice system. It also underscores the challenges faced by ordinary citizens seeking justice when injured during violent protests.
As the legal process continues, many will be watching closely to see how this case develops. The court's insistence on proper investigation reflects the judiciary's role in ensuring transparency and accountability in law enforcement actions.
