Bombay High Court to Hear Mormugao Port Authority's Petition Against Shivaji Statue
The Bombay High Court is set to hear a significant petition filed by the Mormugao Port Authority (MPA) on Wednesday. The authority is seeking the removal of a statue of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj that has been erected on its property, alleging that the installation was carried out illegally.
Allegations of Illegal Installation and Construction
According to the MPA, the statue was installed by supporters of Mormugao MLA Sankalp Amonkar without proper authorization. The petition contends that the statue was erected on MPA's property without legal permission, and the authority has requested the court to issue directions to halt any further work on the site until the case is resolved.
During a mention before the division bench of the high court on Monday, the MPA informed the court that a grant function was held on February 19 to unveil the statue. This event was attended by an MLA and counselors, highlighting the political involvement in the installation.
Ongoing Construction and Authority's Complaints
The MPA further stated that since the unveiling, construction activities have continued every night without interruption. Authorities have allegedly turned a blind eye to these activities, despite complaints from the port authority. The petition details that unknown persons have been engaged in illegal activities, including ground levelling and clearing around the statue, even after the MPA raised concerns.
In response to these ongoing issues, the MPA has sought ad interim ex parte relief from the court. This legal measure aims to prevent the continuation of construction activities on the property, ensuring that no further unauthorized work takes place while the case is pending.
Legal Implications and Next Steps
The case raises important questions about property rights and unauthorized constructions on public land. The Bombay High Court's hearing on Wednesday will be crucial in determining the fate of the statue and addressing the MPA's allegations. The outcome could set a precedent for similar disputes involving illegal installations on government or port authority properties.
As the legal proceedings unfold, stakeholders, including local residents and political figures, will be closely watching the court's decision. The MPA's petition underscores the need for strict adherence to legal protocols in such matters to prevent unauthorized encroachments and ensure proper use of public assets.
