The Supreme Court on Tuesday sought responses from the Centre, the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE), and the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) on a petition challenging the mandate of a third language for Class 9 students. A bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) asked Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati, representing the Centre, to submit a report on the logistical preparedness for implementing the new rule. The court directed the concerned authorities to file their replies within four weeks.
Petition Challenges Third Language Policy
The petition, filed by a group of parents and education activists, argues that the mandatory third language policy violates the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, which recommends a flexible and student-centric approach to language learning. They contend that imposing a third language without adequate infrastructure, trained teachers, and teaching materials would burden students, particularly those from marginalized communities and rural areas. The plea also highlights that many schools lack the resources to offer multiple language options, potentially forcing students to study languages they are not interested in.
Centre's Stand and Logistical Concerns
Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati informed the bench that the government is committed to promoting multilingualism but needs time to assess the preparedness of schools across the country. She assured the court that a detailed report on teacher availability, curriculum development, and implementation timelines would be submitted. The bench, also comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and K.V. Viswanathan, observed that while the objective of promoting linguistic diversity is laudable, the practical challenges cannot be ignored. The court emphasized that any policy change must be accompanied by proper planning to avoid undue stress on students.
CBSE and NCERT's Role
The CBSE and NCERT have been asked to clarify whether they have developed syllabi and textbooks for the third language options. The petition claims that no official circular or guideline has been issued regarding the implementation of the third language requirement for Class 9. The court noted that without clear directives, schools and students are left in a state of confusion. The matter is scheduled for further hearing after the responses are filed.
Background of the Case
The controversy stems from a decision by the CBSE to introduce a mandatory third language for students from Classes 9 to 12, aligning with the NEP 2020's recommendation for multilingual education. However, the petitioners argue that the policy was introduced abruptly without proper consultation with stakeholders. They also point out that the NEP 2020 does not mandate a third language but rather suggests it as an option. The case has garnered significant attention as it affects millions of students across India.
The court's intervention comes at a time when several state governments have also expressed reservations about the policy, citing lack of resources and potential impact on students' academic performance. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for language policies in Indian schools.
