In today's hyper-connected and often polarised world, a profound and persistent question cuts through the noise of endless debates. From heated discussions on social media to personal disagreements, a common thread emerges: everyone involved feels intensely that they are right. This collective certainty leads to a critical dilemma: when everyone is convinced of their own righteousness, who ultimately gets to decide what is actually right?
The Fading Illusion of Absolute Right and Wrong
From a young age, many of us are taught to view morality in clear-cut terms of black and white. However, lived experience and a deeper look at the world reveal a more complex picture. What is considered morally correct in one cultural or personal context can be seen as deeply unjust in another. This relativity does not mean objective truth ceases to exist. Instead, it highlights that truth is frequently filtered through the lens of individual perspective, making it a multifaceted concept far more intricate than simple binaries.
Emotional Certainty Versus Ethical Reasoning
When debates are dominated by the powerful feeling of being right, emotions often steer the conversation. While feelings are valid and a crucial part of the human experience, they are inherently subjective. Ethical decision-making requires a step beyond personal sentiment. It asks us to evaluate actions based on broader principles: does this action reduce harm, show respect for others, and hold validity outside of my own belief system? Navigating this shift from emotional conviction to ethical consideration is one of the great challenges of modern discourse.
The Mechanisms That Decide 'Right' in Society
In practical terms, societal definitions of what is right are often codified through laws, established social norms, and the influence of those in power. Yet, history provides a crucial cautionary note. Legality and popular opinion have not always been synonymous with fairness or justice. Many of the social reforms we now take for granted—from civil rights to gender equality—were born precisely because courageous individuals and groups questioned what the majority accepted as right. This pattern shows that progress is often fueled by thoughtful dissent, not by unanimous agreement.
This is where the role of curiosity becomes invaluable. Replacing defensive certainty with open-minded inquiry allows for understanding over division. It's vital to recognise that some questions transcend the personal feeling of being right or wrong. The final arbiter often involves a combination of legal frameworks, ethical consistency, and universal human values. While this nuanced understanding can be challenging, especially for the young, it is a cornerstone of mature judgment. It requires the heartfelt acceptance that one can be wrong even when feeling intensely right from within.
As we navigate an era of information overload and strong opinions, revisiting these fundamental questions is more important than ever. The journey from subjective feeling to a more objective, ethically sound position is not just a philosophical exercise—it is essential for fostering a more empathetic and functional society.
