In a significant development, Oxford University Press (OUP) India has formally apologised for publishing unverified content about the revered Maratha warrior king, Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, in a book released over two decades ago. The acknowledgment pertains to specific statements found in the 2003 publication titled 'Shivaji: Hindu King in Islamic India'.
The Core of the Controversy
The publisher's statement, released in early January 2026, specifically identified problematic content on pages 31, 33, 34, and 93 of the book. OUP India explicitly acknowledged that certain assertions made in these sections were not properly verified before publication. The book, which has been in circulation since 2003, presented a historical analysis of Shivaji Maharaj's reign within the context of Islamic rule in India.
Publisher's Acknowledgment and Response
The press release from OUP India did not delve into the exact nature of the unverified statements but confirmed that an internal review had flagged these passages. By issuing this apology, one of the world's most prestigious academic publishers has taken responsibility for a lapse in its editorial vetting process. This move is seen as an effort to address concerns that may have been raised by historians, readers, and communities who hold Shivaji Maharaj in high esteem.
The year 2026 marks the point of this formal reconciliation, highlighting how historical narratives and their accuracy remain subjects of scrutiny long after a work is published. The apology underscores the enduring sensitivity and importance of factual precision in historical scholarship, especially concerning iconic national figures.
Implications for Historical Publishing
This incident brings to the fore the critical responsibility shouldered by academic publishers in ensuring the factual integrity of historical works. The apology from OUP sets a precedent for accountability in the publishing industry. It reinforces the idea that scholarly work must undergo rigorous fact-checking to prevent the dissemination of contested or unverified claims, particularly about pivotal personalities like Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj.
For readers and academic circles, this serves as a reminder to engage with historical texts critically. The episode also reflects the ongoing process of revisiting and, where necessary, correcting historical narratives to align with verified evidence and respectful representation.
