Panchkula Police File FIR Against Doctor and Hospital in Medical Negligence Case
In a significant development, Panchkula police have officially registered a First Information Report (FIR) against a doctor and a prominent hospital located in the Mansa Devi Complex (MDC) area. This legal action follows serious allegations of medical negligence during a cesarean section surgery that resulted in a patient sustaining a burn injury.
Complaint Details and Allegations
The case originated from a formal complaint filed by Kiran Singhmar, a resident of Panchkula Sector 21. According to the complaint, her 31-year-old daughter, Ruchika Singhmar, underwent a C-section procedure on November 16, 2025, at Cloudnine Hospital under the supervision of Dr. Shilva. During this routine surgical operation, the patient allegedly suffered a serious burn injury near her ankle—an area completely unrelated to the surgical site.
The FIR contains several critical allegations:
- The hospital failed to immediately inform either the patient or her family members about the burn injury
- The injury was discovered later by family members during post-operative care
- The burn resulted in severe physical pain and permanent scarring
- The patient faced increased risk of infection and significant emotional trauma
- The incident necessitated extended medical treatment and created additional financial burden
Police Investigation and Legal Framework
Police authorities revealed that the matter was initially referred for comprehensive medical examination and expert review. Following submission of the medical inquiry report, investigators determined that offenses under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) were applicable to the case.
The FIR has been registered under two specific BNS sections:
- Section 125(a): Pertaining to reckless or negligent acts that endanger human life or personal safety
- Section 289: Concerning negligent conduct with respect to machinery
The formal registration of the FIR occurred earlier this month, marking a crucial step in the legal proceedings against the medical professionals and institution involved.
Hospital Response and Official Findings
When contacted for comment, Dr. Shilva directed media inquiries to the hospital spokesperson. A spokesperson for Cloudnine Group of Hospitals provided a detailed response to the allegations, stating that the case had undergone thorough review by the Chief Medical Officer's office in Panchkula.
The hospital's official position includes:
- Provision of all necessary medical support to the patient until February 2, 2026
- Appropriate plastic surgery interventions were administered
- The patient's condition remained stable throughout treatment
- Strong refutation of what they termed "misleading claims"
- Assertion that allegations appear aimed at tarnishing the hospital's reputation
- Recommendation that media refer to the CMO's report for accurate information
Medical Committee Findings and Additional Actions
The committee report under the civil surgeon's office reached several important conclusions. The investigation determined that the burn sustained by the patient resulted from an electric accident during the surgical procedure. While the report found no evidence of deliberate action by the operating team, it identified the incident as a preventable accident.
Key findings from the medical committee include:
- Negligence or ignorance regarding proper handling of electrocautery equipment by hospital staff could not be ruled out
- Once the burn was identified, the hospital provided appropriate dermatological and plastic surgery care
- The incident represented a failure in safety protocols during surgical procedures
In addition to the police case, the affected family has approached the consumer forum with a formal complaint, seeking redressal through multiple legal channels. This dual approach highlights the seriousness of the allegations and the family's determination to pursue justice through both criminal and consumer protection frameworks.
The case has drawn significant attention to patient safety protocols in surgical settings and raises important questions about accountability mechanisms within healthcare institutions. As legal proceedings advance, medical professionals and healthcare administrators across the region are closely monitoring developments that could potentially influence future safety standards and liability considerations in medical practice.
