The Delhi High Court on Wednesday asked the central government to look into concerns raised in a public interest litigation (PIL) regarding the film 'Dhurandhar 2'. The petitioner argued that the movie discloses classified protocols and depicts deep cover identities, which could jeopardize national security.
Petition Highlights Security Risks
The PIL, filed by an unnamed petitioner, objects to specific scenes in the film that allegedly reveal sensitive information. According to the petition, 'Dhurandhar 2' uses actual classified protocols in certain sequences and exposes the identities of undercover operatives. The petitioner contends that such depictions violate the Official Secrets Act and pose a threat to intelligence operations.
Court's Directive
A bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Sanjeev Narula heard the matter and directed the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, along with the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), to examine the allegations. The court asked the authorities to submit a report within four weeks, detailing their findings and any actions taken.
Background of the Film
'Dhurandhar 2' is a sequel to the 2023 blockbuster 'Dhurandhar', which was praised for its realistic portrayal of espionage. The film features lead actor Rajkummar Rao reprising his role as an intelligence officer. Directed by Aditya Dhar, the sequel was released in theaters on May 10, 2026, and has been a commercial success. However, the latest controversy has sparked debate over creative freedom versus national security.
Response from Filmmakers
As of now, the filmmakers have not issued an official statement. Sources close to the production suggest that the film underwent standard CBFC scrutiny before release and that any sensitive content was either removed or blurred. The CBFC, which cleared the film with a 'U/A' certificate, has been asked to clarify its vetting process.
Legal Experts Weigh In
Legal analysts note that while filmmakers have the right to artistic expression, they must adhere to legal boundaries. Advocate Prashant Bhushan commented, 'If the film indeed contains classified information, it is a serious matter. The court's intervention is appropriate to balance public interest and national security.'
The next hearing is scheduled for June 15, 2026, by which time the government is expected to submit its report.
