Filmmaker Ram Gopal Varma has stirred a fresh wave of controversy by openly defending his past remarks about the physical appearance of the late legendary actor Sridevi. During a recent podcast appearance, Varma revisited his 2015 comment where he referred to Sridevi's "thunder thighs," questioning the backlash and asking, 'What is wrong with objectification?'
The Podcast Defense: Objectification vs. Observation
In the podcast, recorded in late 2025, Ram Gopal Varma addressed the long-standing criticism he faced for his comments about Sridevi. He clarified that his original remark was made in jest and was not intended to be disrespectful. Varma presented a contentious argument, stating that an actor's physical attributes are an undeniable component of their stardom and public appeal.
He drew comparisons to other stars, suggesting that discussing such traits is part of cinematic and public discourse. Varma's core defense hinged on blurring the line between objectification and what he terms 'artistic observation,' positing that acknowledging physicality is a reality of the film industry.
Revisiting the 2015 Controversy
This debate is not new. The origins trace back to 2015, when Varma faced severe backlash for a chapter in his book and a series of tweets that included the descriptive phrase about Sridevi. The comments provoked outrage from fans, colleagues, and the public, who deemed them disrespectful and reductive towards the acclaimed actress's legacy.
By bringing up the topic again in December 2025, Varma has effectively reopened old wounds. His latest statements have forced the media and public to re-examine the incident, reigniting discussions on sexism, respect for deceased artists, and the boundaries of commentary in the name of candor or humor.
Public Backlash and Lasting Debate
The immediate consequence of Varma's podcast comments has been a renewed and strong backlash on social media and in entertainment circles. Critics argue that his defense normalizes the objectification of women in cinema, regardless of their legendary status. The timing, years after Sridevi's tragic passing, has been viewed by many as particularly insensitive.
This episode underscores a persistent cultural clash in Bollywood and beyond. On one side are voices like Varma's that advocate for unfiltered, provocative expression. On the other is a growing demand for respectful discourse that honors an artist's work without reducing them to physical characteristics. The debate questions where artistic observation ends and harmful objectification begins, a line that remains fiercely contested.
As of December 2025, the controversy continues to spark conversations about legacy, respect, and the evolving standards of public speech in Indian entertainment.
