Congress Criticizes US-India Trade Deal, Warns of Tariff Penalties
Congress Slams US-India Trade Deal Over Tariff Concerns

Congress Leader Jairam Ramesh Launches Scathing Attack on US-India Trade Framework

Senior Congress MP Jairam Ramesh has launched a fierce criticism of the recently announced US-India Interim Trade Agreement, raising serious concerns about its potential impact on India's economic sovereignty and domestic sectors. The opposition leader alleges that preliminary details of the framework reveal provisions that could significantly disadvantage Indian interests across multiple industries.

Tariff Penalties on Russian Oil Imports

One of the most alarming revelations highlighted by Ramesh involves potential tariff penalties targeting India's energy security strategy. According to the Congress leader's assessment of available information, India could face substantial 25 percent tariff penalties if the country continues its current practice of purchasing Russian oil. This provision directly challenges India's established energy procurement policies and could have far-reaching implications for the nation's fuel pricing and energy independence.

Threats to Agricultural Sector and Trade Balance

The opposition criticism extends to agricultural concerns, with Ramesh warning that lowering import duties on US agricultural products could have devastating consequences for India's domestic farming community. The proposed reductions might flood Indian markets with competitively priced American farm goods, potentially undermining local agricultural economies that form the backbone of rural India.

Furthermore, Ramesh expressed apprehension about India's current trade position with the United States. "There are legitimate concerns that India's existing trade surplus with the US could rapidly transform into a deficit," he cautioned, pointing to preliminary data suggesting a sharp increase in imports from American markets under the new framework.

Omissions in Services Sector and Export Concerns

Beyond agricultural and energy issues, the Congress leader identified significant gaps in the interim agreement's coverage. Notably absent are clear provisions addressing India's crucial IT and services sectors, which represent substantial components of the nation's export economy and employment landscape.

Ramesh also raised red flags about potential higher export duties on Indian manufactured goods, warning that such measures would directly hurt Indian exporters who rely on competitive pricing in international markets. This could particularly impact small and medium enterprises that form a vital part of India's export ecosystem.

Calls for Transparency and Detailed Assessment

The opposition criticism concludes with a call for greater transparency regarding the trade agreement's specific terms. Ramesh emphasized that the full implications of the framework will only become clear once detailed provisions are made publicly available for comprehensive analysis and parliamentary scrutiny.

This development represents a significant political challenge to the government's trade diplomacy efforts, with the opposition demanding clearer safeguards for India's economic interests before any final agreement is ratified.